备考GRE考试写作部分，是应该通过一些有效的练习方法来提高的。为此本站小编为大家带来GRE考试写作的有效的练习方法。
1.写作不能只看自己的，必须要研究GRE写作范文，尤其是5分和6分的范文，这样做真的非常重要，因为那是最权威的辅导资料!当然，我们所说的不是简单的熟读和背诵，而是逐字逐句的体会文章的精彩之处，比如说句型，词汇。还有提醒一点，ETS对范文的评论也都非常精彩，建议大家抽出时间来看看，着对理解作文得写法十分有好处。
2.俗话说的好，孰能生巧，所以必须要熟练，重要的是形成惯性思维。同学们都了解，GRE考试时间真的是太紧张了，要想现场认真思考每句话的含义真的是太难了，远远超过了我们平时的认知水平，只有有充分思维准备的人，才能临危不惧，运用自如。比如说，题目中提到politics，大脑中就应当出现Franklin Roosevelt， Lincoln， Gerhard Shroeder， Gandhi……; 提到ART，就该想到Rembrandt， Van Gogh， Starry night， night watch， Henmingway， the old man and the sea……; 提到Scandal，就该想到Nixon，watergate，bill clinton，sex sandal，Enran……但是要做到这个地步是非常不容易的，学生不多加练习的话是不可能做到的。
3.中国有句古话说的好，知错就改，写作文时，也必须多修改，如果不勤修改自己的GRE作文，就不知道自己原来的'漏洞和不足在哪，只写不思考，就等于没写，有时，写作本身不重要，在写作的过程中寻找自己的不足才重要，这样，你会发现自己一直在进步!
4.他山之石，可以攻玉，学生必须学习别人的文章，对于那些优秀作文，是非常宝贵的学习，参考资料，看别人的文章并且从中探索GRE写作思路，是提高自己水平的有效途径。
5.学而不思则罔，因而学生一定要多思考，有这么个说法，多写不如多改，多改不如多想，很多看起来难以解决的问题在思考中就能想明白了。
6.学生要看GRE作文中的题库，不要偷懒，在考试之前找到文章中出现的逻辑错误，远比在半个小时中为它而浪费时间值得的多。
7.学习的过程也是个交流的过程，学生必须多交流，听听大家的意见，有益无害。
8.写作中，学生必须要有自己的例子，阅卷老师并不想看到所有学生的例子都是那几个，这个需要在平时多积累一些。
GRE考试写作的小技巧1. 语言清楚：
建议：以TOEFL 25分水平的同学做标尺，不要写大长从句，一个句子就一个从句，它恰好能够体现逻辑，但又不难写，再多了就可能写得读者看不懂。
2. 思维批判：
这是最重要的。这里我无意长篇介绍什么是批判性思维，大家只要记住做到如下的事情。拿到一篇文章，无论是否同意这个话题，都一定要站在支持者和反对者的角度去分别考虑各自可能给出的理由。任何一篇文章，前半段我都会去写支持者可能会给出什么理由，而后半段我都会去写反对者可能会给出什么理由。给出这些理由，不代表我会同意，但表明了我能够站在客观角度上分析问题。基于这些理由，以及我对这些理由的认可度，我最终形成观点
3. 有证据支持：
这一条是最可以变通的。如果目标5分以上，则选择的证据要精当。但根据官方指南的例子，如果目标是4分，只要我们记住，每一条理由后面好歹给出一两个证据，可以是例子，可以是更多的理由支持，不需要充分，不需要去大量准备素材，有能说得过去的支持就可以达到4分。对比3分，3分的一大问题就是，要么没证据，要么证据完全不相关。这其实是很容易避免的，但也是中国同学得3分的一大原因，因为我们习惯于说大话，习惯于一个段落内都是告诉读者一个建议多么好，但却没有解释为什么好。
补充说明，这里介绍的写作思路对于想要写5分以上的同学是一样的，能够写得更高就在于给出的证据更充分，更深刻。
4. 结构合理：
如果同学们按照先前的行文方式，则这条标准很容易做到。
我对写作的讲解就到此为止，最后补充一句，这些issue话题的观点非个人观点，只是用来应付考试的，大家千万不要把issue考试变成了对真理的追求，这是没有意义的，至少对GRE考试来说。
GRE考试写作的练习题Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.
人们总是在寻找相同点，即使是在非常不同的事物间也不例外，甚至有时候这样做是无用乃至有害的。实际上，我们应该具体问题具体分析;我们应该尽量避免比较的倾向。
GRE写作正文：
In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.
Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one
may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function ’s more, looking for similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.
Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.
In the newly development software engineering model named Object-oriented model,the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as the core and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put into same “classes” and common points are processed together, later they are defined, discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics. This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and over again on similar, if not utterly same, terms. Translated into daily life, starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to grasp distinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we should always bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness and efficiency.
